لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The main focus is around the intention to cause injury. This is usually a major challenge: an especially very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of in the future while in the registration of FIR which has not been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness from the alleged prevalence as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place for being the real brothers of your deceased but they did not respond in any way to the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused is usually a weak sort of evidence which can be manoeuvred with the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is likewise depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light in the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners alongside one another on a motorcycle at 4.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal guidance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the here case continues to be or will be filed.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological factors allows to get a more comprehensive legal reaction.
Enable’s give attention to what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
The Court deemed the case to get maintainable under Article 184 (three) Considering that the Risk and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
department concerned shall supply the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight offered to any reported judgment may perhaps rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
Regardless of its popularity, not many might pay attention to its intricacies. This article is surely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section along with the incredibly lower threshold that governs it.
It's also important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual duration of service pretty much violates the entire service construction being a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention on the legislation nor on the equity. Read more